Sharp AQUOS R11 vs Vivo X200 Pro
46.7Performance74.5
76.2Display73.2
68.3Camera72
50.1Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
5 spec wins — Sharp AQUOS R1111 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+30) and performance (+28). Sharp AQUOS R11 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Sharp AQUOS R11
- Stronger display score: 76 vs 73
- 100% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 57% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 13% lower weight: 195 g vs 223 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 47
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 68
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 50
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- 419% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 39 MP
Display
| Spec | Sharp AQUOS R11 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.5 ″ | 6.78 ″+4% |
| Panel type | LTPO Pro IGZO OLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 452 ppi+14% |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz+100% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,600 nits | 4,500 nits+25% |
| Screen-to-body | 89.8 % | 90.3 %+1% |
Performance
| Spec | Sharp AQUOS R11 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,550,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,800Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 8,600Top 16% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Sharp AQUOS R11 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP+1% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+1% | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | 39 MP | 200 MP+419% |
| Optical zoom | 2.9 x | 3.7 x+28% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+57% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Sharp AQUOS R11 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,100 mAh | 6,000 mAh+18% |
| Wired charging | 36 W | 90 W+150% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Sharp AQUOS R11 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g+13% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.5 mm+4% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Sharp AQUOS R11 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Sharp AQUOS R11 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Sharp AQUOS R11 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |