Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 40 vs Vivo X300 Pro

TECNO CAMON 40
46.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
28.9Performance86.9
60Display74.3
45.9Camera75.8
54.3Battery83.3
60Features84
1 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 407 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and camera (+30). TECNO CAMON 40 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 40

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 60
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 46
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 54
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 40Vivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.78 ″6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x24361260x2800
Pixel density393 ppi452 ppi+15%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—91.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 40Vivo X300 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G100 UltimateMediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,533,222
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,473Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,264Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 40Vivo X300 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperture—f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 40Vivo X300 Pro
Capacity5,200 mAh6,510 mAh+25%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 40Vivo X300 Pro
Weight—226 g
Thickness7.3 mm+8%8 mm
IP ratingIP66IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 40Vivo X300 Pro
5GNoYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 40Vivo X300 Pro
OS at launchHiOS 15 (Android 15)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge—5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 40Vivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup