Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G vs Vivo X200 Pro

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
55.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X200 Pro

vivo

Vivo X200 Pro

$1,099

75.2Inno Score
25.9Performance74.5
75.9Display73.2
60.5Camera72
66.6Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
4 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G9 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 55.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+49) and battery (+13). TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G

  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz

Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 75 vs 26
  • Stronger camera score: 72 vs 61
  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 67
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X200 Pro
Screen size6.78 ″6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1208x26441260x2800
Pixel density429 ppi452 ppi+5%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X200 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 UltimateMediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTu—2,550,000
Geekbench 6 (single)1,057Bottom 39%2,800+165%Top 19%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,148Bottom 43%8,600+173%Top 16%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3 x3.7 x+23%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+56%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X200 Pro
Capacity6,500 mAh+8%6,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—30 W
Active use endurance—13 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X200 Pro
Weight—223 g
Thickness7.8 mm+9%8.5 mm
IP ratingIP66/IP68/IP69/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X200 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X200 Pro
OS at launchHiOS 16 (Android 16)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
OS update pledge3 years4 years+33%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X200 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs POCO M8 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs HONOR X60 ProVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs iQOO Z11SVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs vivo T4 ProVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS

Try another matchup