Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G vs Vivo X300 Pro

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
55.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
25.9Performance86.9
75.9Display74.3
60.5Camera75.8
66.6Battery83.3
73.3Features84
2 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G10 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 55.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+61) and battery (+17). TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G

  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 26
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 61
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 67
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.78 ″6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1208x26441260x2800
Pixel density429 ppi452 ppi+5%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—91.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X300 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 UltimateMediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,533,222
Geekbench 6 (single)1,057Bottom 39%3,473+229%Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,148Bottom 43%10,264+226%Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X300 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3 x3.7 x+23%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X300 Pro
Capacity6,500 mAh6,510 mAh
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X300 Pro
Weight—226 g
Thickness7.8 mm+3%8 mm
IP ratingIP66/IP68/IP69/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X300 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X300 Pro
OS at launchHiOS 16 (Android 16)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5GVivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs POCO M8 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs HONOR X60 ProVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs iQOO Z11SVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs vivo T4 ProVSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS

Try another matchup