Skip to content
InnoReviews

Tecno Camon Slim 4G vs Vivo X300 Pro

Tecno Camon Slim 4G
47.5Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
28.9Performance86.9
73Display74.3
34.1Camera75.8
62.4Battery83.3
49.3Features84
2 spec wins — Tecno Camon Slim 4G9 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 47.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and camera (+42). Tecno Camon Slim 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Tecno Camon Slim 4G

  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 20% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 8 mm

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 62
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 49
  • 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB

Display

Display comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GVivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.78 ″6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1224x27201260x2800
Pixel density440 ppi452 ppi+3%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body87.7 %91.6 %+4%

Performance

Performance comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GVivo X300 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G200 UltimateMediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,533,222
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,473Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,264Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GVivo X300 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GVivo X300 Pro
Capacity5,600 mAh6,510 mAh+16%
Wired charging60 W90 W+50%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GVivo X300 Pro
Weight—226 g
Thickness6.4 mm+20%8 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GVivo X300 Pro
5GNoYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GVivo X300 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HiOS 16.2)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GVivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup