Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON Slim 5G vs Vivo X200 Pro

T
51.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X200 Pro

vivo

Vivo X200 Pro

$1,099

75.2Inno Score
28.9Performance74.5
74.2Display73.2
45.9Camera72
61.9Battery79.9
65.3Features78.7
3 spec wins — TECNO CAMON Slim 5G6 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 51.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+46) and camera (+26). TECNO CAMON Slim 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON Slim 5G

  • 25% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 8.5 mm
  • 23% lower weight: 171 g vs 223 g
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz

Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 75 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 72 vs 46
  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 62
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 65
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X200 Pro
Screen size6.78 ″6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1208x26441260x2800
Pixel density429 ppi452 ppi+5%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body89.2 %90.3 %+1%

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X200 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300eMediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTu—2,550,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,800Top 19%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—8,600Top 16%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X200 Pro
Capacity6,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—30 W
Active use endurance—13 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X200 Pro
Weight171 g+23%223 g
Thickness6.4 mm+25%8.5 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X200 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X200 Pro
OS at launchHiOS 16 (Android 16)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
OS update pledge3 years4 years+33%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X200 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup