Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON Slim 5G vs Vivo X300 Pro

T
51.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
28.9Performance86.9
74.2Display74.3
45.9Camera75.8
61.9Battery83.3
65.3Features84
3 spec wins — TECNO CAMON Slim 5G8 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 51.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and camera (+30). TECNO CAMON Slim 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON Slim 5G

  • 24% lower weight: 171 g vs 226 g
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 20% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 8 mm

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 46
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 62
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 65
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.78 ″6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1208x26441260x2800
Pixel density429 ppi452 ppi+5%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body89.2 %91.6 %+3%

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300eMediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,533,222
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,473Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,264Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Capacity6,000 mAh6,510 mAh+9%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Weight171 g+24%226 g
Thickness6.4 mm+20%8 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
OS at launchHiOS 16 (Android 16)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO CAMON Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

TECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs POCO F6VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs REDMI Note 15 5GVSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy A56VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs iPhone 14 ProVSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS

Try another matchup