Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G vs Vivo X200 Pro

TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G
53.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X200 Pro

vivo

Vivo X200 Pro

$1,099

75.2Inno Score
46.7Performance74.5
75.9Display73.2
30.1Camera72
71.3Battery79.9
44Features78.7
4 spec wins — TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G6 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 53.9, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+42) and features (+35). TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G

  • 33% higher capacity: 8,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 13% lower weight: 195 g vs 223 g
  • 13% lower thickness: 7.4 mm vs 8.5 mm

Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 75 vs 47
  • Stronger camera score: 72 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 71
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 44
  • 146% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 13 MP

Display

Display comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X200 Pro
Screen size6.78 ″6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23641260x2800
Pixel density383 ppi452 ppi+18%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X200 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7100MediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTu—2,550,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,800Top 19%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—8,600Top 16%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X200 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video1440p@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP32 MP+146%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X200 Pro
Capacity8,000 mAh+33%6,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—30 W
Active use endurance—13 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X200 Pro
Weight195 g+13%223 g
Thickness7.4 mm+13%8.5 mm
IP ratingIP64IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X200 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X200 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HiOS 16)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
OS update pledge2 years4 years+100%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X200 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X200 Pro
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup