Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO POVA Slim 5G vs Vivo X300 Pro

TECNO POVA Slim 5G
43.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
21.8Performance86.9
79.4Display74.3
30.1Camera75.8
54Battery83.3
44Features84
3 spec wins — TECNO POVA Slim 5G9 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 43.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+65) and camera (+46). TECNO POVA Slim 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO POVA Slim 5G

  • Stronger display score: 79 vs 74
  • 31% lower weight: 156 g vs 226 g
  • 26% lower thickness: 6 mm vs 8 mm
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 22
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 54
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 44
  • 466% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,264 vs 1,813

Display

Display comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.78 ″6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1224x27201260x2800
Pixel density440 ppi452 ppi+3%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—91.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6400MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,533,222
Geekbench 6 (single)658Bottom 11%3,473+428%Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,813Bottom 11%10,264+466%Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video1440p@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Capacity5,160 mAh6,510 mAh+26%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Weight156 g+31%226 g
Thickness6 mm+26%8 mm
IP ratingIP64IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
OS at launchHiOS 15 (Android 15)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge1 years5 years+400%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

TECNO POVA Slim 5Gvs Infinix HOT 50 Pro+VSTECNO POVA Slim 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy M35 5GVSTECNO POVA Slim 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S21VSTECNO POVA Slim 5Gvs Moto G55 5GVSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS

Try another matchup