Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO SPARK 30 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro

TECNO SPARK 30 Pro
41.3Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
28.9Performance86.9
50.1Display74.3
34.9Camera75.8
47.8Battery83.3
60Features84
4 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 30 Pro7 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 41.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and camera (+41). TECNO SPARK 30 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 30 Pro

  • 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
  • 17% lower weight: 188 g vs 226 g
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 50
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 35
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 48
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Pro
Screen size6.78 ″6.78 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x24361260x2800
Pixel density393 ppi452 ppi+15%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,700 nits4,500 nits+165%
Screen-to-body—91.6 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G100MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,533,222
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,473Top 6%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,264Top 6%
Wild Life Extreme stability—59 %Bottom 20%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Pro
Main camera108 MP+116%50 MP
Main aperture—f/1.57
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Pro
Capacity5,000 mAh6,510 mAh+30%
Wired charging33 W90 W+173%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—12.8 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Pro
Weight188 g+17%226 g
Thickness7.4 mm+7%8 mm
IP ratingIP54IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Pro
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 14 (HiOS 14)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge—5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Pro
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackYesNo

Related comparisons

TECNO SPARK 30 Provs Xiaomi 13 LiteVSTECNO SPARK 30 Provs Samsung Galaxy A17 5GVSTECNO SPARK 30 Provs Huawei nova 12 SEVSTECNO SPARK 30 Provs POCO F3VSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS

Try another matchup