TECNO SPARK 40 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro
28.9Performance86.9
77.8Display74.3
30.1Camera75.8
54.3Battery83.3
60Features84
3 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 40 Pro7 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 47.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and camera (+46). TECNO SPARK 40 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
- Stronger display score: 78 vs 74
- 25% lower weight: 170 g vs 226 g
- 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 16% lower thickness: 6.7 mm vs 8 mm
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 87 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 54
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 60
- 285% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 13 MP
Display
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″ | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 452 ppi+3% |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 89.3 % | 91.6 %+3% |
Performance
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,533,222 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,473Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 10,264Top 6% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 59 %Bottom 20% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | — | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 1440p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP+285% |
| OIS | — | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,510 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | — | 40 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12.8 h |
Design
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 170 g+25% | 226 g |
| Thickness | 6.7 mm+16% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (HiOS 15) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | — | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Vivo X300 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
TECNO SPARK 40 Provs Infinix NOTE 40X 5GVSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs Infinix NOTE 50VSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs vivo V50 LiteVSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs iPhone 13 ProVSVivo X300 Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSVivo X300 Provs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300 Provs Redmi K90 Pro MaxVS