Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro
55.2Performance74.5
53.7Display73.2
46.8Camera72
94.7Battery79.9
60Features78.7
5 spec wins — Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra10 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 61.6, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+25) and display (+20). Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra
- Stronger battery score: 95 vs 80
- 77% higher capacity: 10,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh
- 67% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 30 W
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 33% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 90 W
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 55
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 60
- 105% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 2,200 nits
Display
| Spec | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.67 ″ | 6.78 ″+2% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 452 ppi+14% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,200 nits | 4,500 nits+105% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,550,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,158Top 29% | 2,800+30%Top 19% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,082Top 22% | 8,600+21%Top 16% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 50 MP+56% | 32 MP |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 10,600 mAh+77% | 6,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 120 W+33% | 90 W |
| Wireless charging | 50 W+67% | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 450 g | 223 g+50% |
| Thickness | 19.4 mm | 8.5 mm+56% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69K | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Ulefone Armor 28 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
Ulefone Armor 28 Ultravs iPhone AirVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Huawei Mate XT Ultimate DesignVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs iQOO Z9 TurboVSUlefone Armor 28 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Find X10VSVivo X200 Provs Motorola Edge 70 MaxVSVivo X200 Provs OPPO Reno16 Pro 5GVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVS