Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite

WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
VS
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
31.6Inno Score
86.9Performance23.6
74.3Display35.4
75.8Camera32.3
83.3Battery40.8
84Features28
17 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro3 spec wins — Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 31.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+63) and features (+56). Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 24
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 35
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 32
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 41
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 28

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite

  • 30% lower weight: 159 g vs 226 g
  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • 15% lower thickness: 6.8 mm vs 8 mm

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Screen size6.78 ″+4%6.55 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1260x28002400x1080
Pixel density452 ppi+12%402 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+463%800 nits
Screen-to-body91.6 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Lite
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500Snapdragon 732G
AnTuTu3,533,222+762%410,000
Geekbench 6 (single)3,473+369%Top 6%740Bottom 16%
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,264+426%Top 6%1,950Bottom 14%
Wild Life Extreme stability59 %Bottom 20%—
RAM (max)16 GB+167%6 GB
Storage options256/512GB/1TB64GB / 128GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Main camera50 MP64 MP+28%
Main aperturef/1.57f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto200 MP—
Optical zoom3.7 x—
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+213%16 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Capacity6,510 mAh+53%4,250 mAh
Wired charging90 W+173%33 W
Wireless charging40 W—
Active use endurance12.8 h—

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Weight226 g159 g+30%
Thickness8 mm6.8 mm+15%
IP ratingIP68/IP69—
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Lite
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.1
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Lite
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 11 (MIUI 12)
OS update pledge5 years+150%2 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Lite
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup