Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

WINNER
Vivo X300 Pro
81.2Inno Score
VS
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

$1,199

57.6Inno Score
86.9Performance40.8
74.3Display57.6
75.8Camera66.4
83.3Battery70.2
84Features65.3
14 spec wins — Vivo X300 Pro4 spec wins — Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.2 to 57.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+46) and features (+19). Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 87 vs 41
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 58
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 66
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 70
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 65

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

  • 68% higher Wireless charging: 67 W vs 40 W
  • 35% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3.7 x
  • 14% higher Pixel density: 515 ppi vs 452 ppi

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.81 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO OLED
Resolution1260x28003200x1440
Pixel density452 ppi515 ppi+14%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+165%1,700 nits
Screen-to-body91.6 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu3,533,222+240%1,040,324
Geekbench 6 (single)3,473+140%Top 6%1,450Top 44%
Geekbench 6 (multi)10,264+181%Top 6%3,650Top 50%
Wild Life Extreme stability59 %Bottom 20%—
RAM (max)16 GB+33%12 GB
Storage options256/512GB/1TB256GB / 512GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.57f/2.0
Ultra-wide50 MP+4%48 MP
Telephoto200 MP+317%48 MP
Optical zoom3.7 x5 x+35%
Max video8K@30fps8K@24fps
Front camera50 MP+150%20 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Capacity6,510 mAh+30%5,000 mAh
Wired charging90 W+34%67 W
Wireless charging40 W67 W+68%
Active use endurance12.8 h—

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Weight226 g+3%234 g
Thickness8 mm+5%8.4 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 11 (MIUI 12)
OS update pledge5 years+67%3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X300 Pro versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecVivo X300 ProXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup