vivo Y03 vs ZTE Blade A35
20chipPerformance20
35.2Display36.1
20.5Camera20
38.8Battery38.8
20Features20
5 spec wins — vivo Y031 spec wins — ZTE Blade A35
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: vivo Y03 scores 26.9 against 27 for ZTE Blade A35. Pick by the categories that matter to you — ZTE Blade A35 edges ahead in display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the vivo Y03
- 150% higher Front camera: 5 MP vs 2 MP
- 63% higher Main camera: 13 MP vs 8 MP
- 50% higher Wired charging: 15 W vs 10 W
Reasons to pick the ZTE Blade A35
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Display
| Spec | vivo Y03 | ZTE Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.56 ″ | 6.75 ″+3% |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1600 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi+3% | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Screen-to-body | — | 83.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | vivo Y03 | ZTE Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Unisoc SC9863A1 |
| RAM (max) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage options | 64/128GB | 64GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Camera
| Spec | vivo Y03 | ZTE Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 13 MP+63% | 8 MP |
| Main aperture | f/2.2 | — |
| Max video | — | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 5 MP+150% | 2 MP |
| OIS | No | — |
Battery
| Spec | vivo Y03 | ZTE Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 15 W+50% | 10 W |
Design
| Spec | vivo Y03 | ZTE Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 185 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm+1% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | vivo Y03 | ZTE Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | No | — |
Software
| Spec | vivo Y03 | ZTE Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) | Android 14 (Go edition) |
Audio
| Spec | vivo Y03 | ZTE Blade A35 |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | — | Yes |