Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek MT8163

Apple A10 Fusion
—Inno Score
VS
MediaTek MT8163
—Inno Score
29.1CPU20
23.8GPU30
20Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Apple A10 Fusion0 spec wins — MediaTek MT8163

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Apple A10 Fusion and MediaTek MT8163 lack the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A10 Fusion

  • Stronger CPU score: 29 vs 20
  • 56% higher Max clock: 2.34 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
  • 43% lower process: 16 nm vs 28 nm

Reasons to pick the MediaTek MT8163

  • Stronger GPU score: 30 vs 24

General

General comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8163
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8163
Announced20162015
Process16 nm+43%28 nm
ArchitectureArmv8Armv8-A

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8163
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8163
Cores44
Core configuration2x2.34 GHz Hurricane + 2x Zephyr4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 (V/A; V/B up to 1.3 GHz)
Max clock2.34 GHz+56%1.5 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8163
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8163
GPUPowerVR Series7XT Plus (6-core)Arm Mali-T720 MP2
GPU clock—600 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8163
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8163
Memory typeLPDDR4DDR3 / LPDDR3
Max bandwidth—6.4 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8163
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8163
ModemQualcomm MDM9645M or Intel XMM 7360 LTE (external)—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth4.24.0

Media

Media comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8163
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8163
Max display2160x1620Full HD (1920x1080)
Video capture4K@30fps1080p

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8163
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8163
3DMark Wild Life Extreme664Bottom 44%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup