Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek MT8176

Apple A10 Fusion
—Inno Score
VS
MediaTek MT8176
—Inno Score
29.1CPU22.7
23.8GPU30
20Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Apple A10 Fusion1 spec wins — MediaTek MT8176

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Apple A10 Fusion and MediaTek MT8176 lack the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A10 Fusion

  • Stronger CPU score: 29 vs 23
  • 43% lower process: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 11% higher Max clock: 2.34 GHz vs 2.1 GHz

Reasons to pick the MediaTek MT8176

  • Stronger GPU score: 30 vs 24
  • 50% higher cores: 6 vs 4

General

General comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8176
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8176
Announced20162016
Process16 nm+43%28 nm
ArchitectureArmv8Armv8-A

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8176
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8176
Cores46+50%
Core configuration2x2.34 GHz Hurricane + 2x Zephyr2x2.1 GHz Cortex-A72 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53
Max clock2.34 GHz+11%2.1 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8176
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8176
GPUPowerVR Series7XT Plus (6-core)IMG PowerVR GX6250
GPU clock—600 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8176
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8176
Memory typeLPDDR4LPDDR3 (dual channel)

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8176
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8176
ModemQualcomm MDM9645M or Intel XMM 7360 LTE (external)—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth4.2—

Media

Media comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8176
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8176
Max display2160x1620WQXGA (2560x1600)
Video capture4K@30fps1080p@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A10 Fusion versus MediaTek MT8176
SpecApple A10 FusionMediaTek MT8176
3DMark Wild Life Extreme664Bottom 44%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup