Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A11 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1610

A
25Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
28.6CPU27.3
25.6GPU—
20AIspec-based—
20Efficiencyspec-based—
2 spec wins — Apple A11 Bionic3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A11 Bionic

  • 15% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,100 vs 953

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A11 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Announced20172026
Process10 nm—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A11 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x2.39 GHz Monsoon + 4x Mistral2 + 6
Max clock2.39 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A11 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
GPUApple GPU (3-core)Mali-G68

AI

AI comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A11 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
NPUNeural Engine (2-core)—
AI performance1 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A11 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR4X—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A11 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
ModemQualcomm MDM9655 or Intel XMM 7480 LTE (external)—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.05.3

Media

Media comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A11 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Max display2436x1125—
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A11 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A11 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Geekbench 6 (single)1,100+15%Top 43%953Bottom 43%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,245+5%Bottom 40%2,144Bottom 37%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme891Bottom 31%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup