Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1610 vs Unisoc SC9863A

Samsung Exynos 1610
24.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Unisoc SC9863A
25.6Inno Score
27.3CPU20
21.5GPU—
—Benchmarks20
—Efficiencyspec-based44.2
4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16100 spec wins — Unisoc SC9863A

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Samsung Exynos 1610 scores 24.7 against 25.6 for Unisoc SC9863A. Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 27 vs 20
  • 694% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 953 vs 120
  • 399% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 2,144 vs 430
  • 50% higher Max clock: 2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz

Reasons to pick the Unisoc SC9863A

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc SC9863A
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc SC9863A
Announced20262019
Process—28 nm
TDP (typical)—5 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc SC9863A
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc SC9863A
Cores88
Core configuration2 + 64x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 + 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+50%1.6 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc SC9863A
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc SC9863A
GPUMali-G68IMG PowerVR GE8322

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc SC9863A
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc SC9863A
Memory type—LPDDR3-933
Max bandwidth—7.5 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc SC9863A
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc SC9863A
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-4
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth5.34.2

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc SC9863A
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc SC9863A
Max display—HD+ @ 60Hz
Video capture—1080p@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc SC9863A
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc SC9863A
AnTuTu—100,000
Geekbench 6 (single)953+694%Bottom 44%120Bottom 1%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,144+399%Bottom 38%430Bottom 1%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme384Bottom 24%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup