Apple A13 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
34.7CPU51.7
34.3GPU49.4
52.2Benchmarks71.2
24.9AI—
41.8Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Apple A13 Bionic8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 38.2, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+25) and benchmarks (+19). Apple A13 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A13 Bionic
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 35
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 34
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 52
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 42
- 113% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 900,000
General
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.65 GHz Lightning + 4x1.8 GHz Thunder | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.65 GHz | 3.2 GHz+21% |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Neural Engine (8-core) | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 6 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Intel XMM 7660 LTE (external) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | Retina XDR | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A13 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 900,000Top 36% | 1,914,857+113%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340Top 34% | 2,150+60%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,400Top 36% | 6,600+94%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,950Top 56% | 3,800+95%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Apple A13 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 1080VSApple A13 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2VSApple A13 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSApple A13 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS
