MediaTek Dimensity 8450 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
46.2CPU50.9
51.4GPU49.5
73.6Benchmarks71.2
68Efficiencyspec-based66.5
8 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 84503 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: MediaTek Dimensity 8450 scores 57.3 against 57.6 for Samsung Exynos 2400. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Exynos 2400 edges ahead in CPU, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8450
- 24% higher AnTuTu 11 (UX): 528,448 vs 425,200
- 13% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 637,559 vs 562,338
- 10% higher AnTuTu: 2,098,073 vs 1,914,857
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 51 vs 46
- 32% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,066 vs 1,566
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.25 GHz+2% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G720 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (3GPP R16) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 2,098,073+10%Top 21% | 1,914,857Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 638,138Top 21% | 637,914Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 637,559+13%Top 24% | 562,338Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 293,928+2%Top 31% | 289,405Top 32% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 528,448+24%Top 18% | 425,200Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 12 | — | 2,168,458Top 23% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,566Top 26% | 2,066+32%Top 17% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,137Top 19% | 6,534+6%Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,044+6%Top 13% | 3,812Top 14% |
Use this on your site or forum
Copy a ready-made link. Scores on this page update as new results are published, so the link always leads to the current figures.
HTML (for a website or blog)
Markdown (Reddit, GitHub, Discord)
BBCode (forums)
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8450vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSMediaTek Dimensity 8450vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8450vs MediaTek Dimensity 8550VSMediaTek Dimensity 8450vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8550VS