MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
45.9CPU51.7
46.1GPU49.4
71.7Benchmarks71.2
73.8Efficiency66.5
6 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 84006 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 56.3, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+6) and GPU (+3). MediaTek Dimensity 8400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8400
- Stronger efficiency score: 74 vs 67
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
- 17% higher AnTuTu 10 (Memory): 339,619 vs 289,405
- 14% higher AnTuTu 10 (GPU): 642,040 vs 562,338
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 46
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 46
- 48% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 1,450
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
- 14% higher AnTuTu 10 (CPU): 637,914 vs 560,176
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.25 GHz+2% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G720 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 880 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,946,644+2%Top 12% | 1,914,857Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,450Top 28% | 2,150+48%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,400Top 16% | 6,600+3%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,400Top 32% | 3,800+12%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 560,176Top 32% | 637,914+14%Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 642,040+14%Top 23% | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 339,619+17%Top 23% | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 404,809Top 32% | 425,200+5%Top 29% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSMediaTek Dimensity 8400vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVS

