Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400

Apple A16 Bionic
56.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Exynos 2400
57.9Inno Score
56.8CPU51.7
43.7GPU49.4
61.5Benchmarks71.2
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency66.5
3 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 56.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+10) and GPU (+6). Apple A16 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic

  • Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 52
  • Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 67
  • 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
  • 22% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 2,150

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 44
  • Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 62
  • 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
  • 47% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 1,300,000
  • 23% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 3,100

General

General comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2400
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2400
Announced20222023
Process4 nm4 nm
TDP (typical)7 W+22%9 W
ArchitectureArmv8.6Armv9.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2400
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2400
Cores610+67%
Core configuration2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520
Max clock3.46 GHz+8%3.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2400
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2400
GPUApple GPU (5-core)Samsung Xclipse 940

AI

AI comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2400
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2400
NPU16-core Neural EngineSamsung NPU
AI performance17 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2400
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2400
Memory typeLPDDR5-6400LPDDR5X
Max bandwidth51.2 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2400
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2400
ModemExternal (Snapdragon X65)Integrated Exynos 5G modem

Media

Media comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2400
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2400
Video capture4K@60fps8K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A16 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 2400
SpecApple A16 BionicSamsung Exynos 2400
AnTuTu 101,300,000Top 23%1,914,857+47%Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (single)2,620+22%Top 11%2,150Top 16%
Geekbench 6 (multi)6,570Top 15%6,600Top 15%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,100Top 36%3,800+23%Top 21%
AnTuTu 10 (CPU)—637,914Top 26%
AnTuTu 10 (GPU)—562,338Top 29%
AnTuTu 10 (Memory)—289,405Top 40%
AnTuTu 10 (UX)—425,200Top 29%

Related comparisons

Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVS

Try another matchup