Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
56.6CPU50.9
43.8GPU49.5
—Benchmarks71.2
52.7AIspec-based—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based66.5
4 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Apple A16 Bionic scores 57.1 against 57.6 for Samsung Exynos 2400. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Exynos 2400 edges ahead in GPU, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 51
- 24% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,566 vs 2,066
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger GPU score: 50 vs 44
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
- 22% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,812 vs 3,116
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+8% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,914,857Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 32% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 12 | — | 2,168,458Top 23% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,566+24%Top 12% | 2,066Top 17% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,673+2%Top 15% | 6,534Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,116Top 19% | 3,812+22%Top 14% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8450VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8550VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8550VS

