Apple A14 Bionic vs Google Tensor G4
46CPU45.1
35.1GPU43.1
53.6Benchmarks56.1
41.1AI—
63.2Efficiency71.4
3 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic6 spec wins — Google Tensor G4
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G4 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 51.4 to 46.9, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+8) and GPU (+8). Apple A14 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- 14% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 7 W
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- Stronger GPU score: 43 vs 35
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 63
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 27% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,600 vs 2,050
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2024 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+14% | 7 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 |
| GPU clock | — | 940 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Google Edge TPU |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000Top 34% | 1,050,000+11%Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080+7%Top 17% | 1,950Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900+4%Top 23% | 4,700Top 24% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 53% | 2,600+27%Top 42% |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VS

