Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc T7250
46CPU20
35.1GPU25
53.6Benchmarks—
41.1AIspec-based—
63.2Efficiencyspec-based20
6 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic2 spec wins — Unisoc T7250
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A14 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.9 to 21.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+26) and GPU (+10). Unisoc T7250 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 20
- Stronger GPU score: 35 vs 25
- 1206% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,050 vs 157
- 385% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,080 vs 429
- 250% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,900 vs 1,402
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7250
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2024 |
| Process | 5 nm+58% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+67% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G57 |
| GPU clock | — | 850 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s+129% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc T7250 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 950,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080+385%Top 15% | 429Bottom 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900+250%Top 22% | 1,402Bottom 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050+1206%Top 34% | 157Bottom 8% |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSUnisoc T7250vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020VSUnisoc T7250vs Unisoc T620VSUnisoc T7250vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678VSUnisoc T7250vs Unisoc T616VS

