Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T820
46CPU27
35.1GPU—
53.6Benchmarks35.9
41.1AI—
63.2Efficiency52.5
6 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic2 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A14 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.9 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+19) and benchmarks (+18). Unisoc Tiger T820 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 63 vs 53
- 201% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,080 vs 690
- 118% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,900 vs 2,250
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm+17% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 6 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+11% | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s+99% | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000+102%Top 34% | 470,000Top 63% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080+201%Top 17% | 690Top 75% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900+118%Top 23% | 2,250Top 59% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 53% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS