Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T612
46CPU20
35.1GPU—
53.6Benchmarks20
41.1AI—
63.2Efficiency46.7
6 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic3 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A14 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.9 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+34) and CPU (+26). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 63 vs 47
- 395% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,080 vs 420
- 280% higher AnTuTu 10: 950,000 vs 250,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 6 W
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2021 |
| Process | 5 nm+58% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 4 W+33% |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+67% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s+129% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000+280%Top 34% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080+395%Top 17% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900+227%Top 23% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 53% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS