Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1610

Apple A15 Bionic
51.2Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
51CPU30.7
40GPU—
58.4Benchmarks—
50.7AIspec-based—
60.7Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Apple A15 Bionic2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A15 Bionic

  • Stronger CPU score: 51 vs 31
  • 35% higher Max clock: 3.24 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Announced20212026
Process5 nm—
TDP (typical)7 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.5—

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x3.24 GHz + 4x2.01 GHz2 + 6
Max clock3.24 GHz+35%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
GPUApple GPU (4/5-core)Mali-G68

AI

AI comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
NPU16-core Neural Engine—
AI performance16 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-4266—
Max bandwidth34.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
ModemExternal (Snapdragon X60)—
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.3

Media

Media comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu1,150,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,320Top 14%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)5,650Top 23%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,650Top 42%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup