Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 6360 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Dimensity 6360
26.3Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
25.4CPU30.7
21.5GPU—
36Efficiencyspec-based—
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 63600 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 6360

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 25

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20262026
Process6 nm—
ArchitectureArmv8.2—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552 + 6
Max clock2.4 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Mali-G68

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-4266—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 5G modem (3GPP Release 16)—
Max download3.3 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displayFHD+ @ 120Hz—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Samsung Exynos 1610
Geekbench 6 (single)769Bottom 32%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,978Bottom 29%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme378Bottom 9%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup