Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2600
51CPU72.6
40GPU77.4
58.4Benchmarks81.1
50.7AIspec-based—
60.7Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Apple A15 Bionic6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 51.2, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+37) and benchmarks (+23). Apple A15 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A15 Bionic
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 51
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 40
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 58
- 173% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 2,650
- 92% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 5,650
General
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2026 |
| Process | 5 nm | 2 nm+60% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.5 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.24 GHz + 4x2.01 GHz | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.24 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4/5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 16 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X60) | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,150,000 | 2,827,538Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,320Top 14% | 2,995+29%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,650Top 23% | 10,824+92%Top 5% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,650Top 42% | 7,230+173%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Apple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSApple A15 Bionicvs Google Tensor G4VSApple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSApple A15 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

