Apple A16 Bionic vs Google Tensor G2
56.5CPU30.6
41GPU31.8
54.8Benchmarks36.2
52.7AI0
71.4Efficiency58.3
7 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic1 spec wins — Google Tensor G2
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 54.1 to 36.8, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+53) and CPU (+26). Google Tensor G2 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 41 vs 32
- Stronger benchmarks score: 55 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 58
- 90% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,570 vs 3,450
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G2
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2022 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+12% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+21% | 2.85 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G710 MC7 |
| GPU clock | — | 848 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Google Edge TPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G2 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+67% | 780,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+83% | 1,430 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+90% | 3,450 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+72% | 1,800 |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Google TensorVSGoogle Tensor G2vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSGoogle Tensor G2vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VS

