Apple A16 Bionic vs Google Tensor G4
56.8CPU45.1
43.7GPU43.1
61.5Benchmarks56.1
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency71.4
5 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Google Tensor G4
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 51.4, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+12) and benchmarks (+5). Google Tensor G4 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 45
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 56
- 40% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,570 vs 4,700
- 34% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 1,950
- 24% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,300,000 vs 1,050,000
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2024 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 7 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+12% | 3.1 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 |
| GPU clock | — | 940 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Google Edge TPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+24%Top 23% | 1,050,000Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+34%Top 11% | 1,950Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+40%Top 15% | 4,700Top 24% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+19%Top 36% | 2,600Top 42% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VS

