Apple A16 Bionic vs Google Tensor G4
56.6CPU43.9
43.8GPU43.1
—Benchmarks65.5
52.7AIspec-based—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based71.4
4 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Google Tensor G4
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 54.9 to 53.1, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+13) and GPU (+1). Google Tensor G4 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 44
- 46% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,673 vs 4,560
- 39% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,566 vs 1,848
- 20% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,116 vs 2,603
- 12% higher Max clock: 3.46 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2024 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 7 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+12% | 3.1 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 |
| GPU clock | — | 940 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Google Edge TPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G4 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,523,637 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,566+39%Top 11% | 1,848Top 20% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,673+46%Top 15% | 4,560Top 25% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,116+20%Top 19% | 2,603Top 22% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8550VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Samsung Exynos 1580VS

