Apple A16 Bionic vs Google Tensor G6
56.8CPU63.3
43.7GPU53.8
61.5Benchmarks72.3
52.7AIspec-based—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based84
0 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic8 spec wins — Google Tensor G6
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G6 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 56.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+11) and GPU (+10). Apple A16 Bionic still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 57
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 44
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 62
- 53% higher AnTuTu: 1,994,033 vs 1,300,000
- 25% lower process: 3 nm vs 4 nm
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 7+17% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz | 4.1 GHz+18% |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 |
| GPU clock | — | 1,286 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Google TPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | — |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Google Tensor G6 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,300,000 | 1,994,033+53% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620Top 13% | 2,724+4%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570Top 17% | 7,535+15%Top 13% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100Top 38% | 3,420+10%Top 33% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVS

