Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1380
56.8CPU29.2
43.7GPU25
61.5Benchmarks42.1
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency63.2
6 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1380
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 36.6, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+28) and benchmarks (+19). Samsung Exynos 1380 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 29
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 25
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 42
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 63
- 284% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,100 vs 808
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1380
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 14% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 6 W+14% |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+44% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G68 MP5 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+116% | 602,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+159% | 1,010 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+138% | 2,760 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+284% | 808 |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSSamsung Exynos 1380vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VS

