Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 1610

Apple A17 Pro
62.7Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
62.7CPU30.7
47.8GPU—
64.2Benchmarks—
72AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro

  • Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 31
  • 57% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A17 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
Announced20232026
Process3 nm—
TDP (typical)8 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.6—

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A17 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz2 + 6
Max clock3.78 GHz+57%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A17 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
GPUApple GPU (6-core)Mali-G68

AI

AI comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A17 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
NPU16-core Neural Engine—
AI performance35 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A17 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5-6400—
Max bandwidth51.2 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A17 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
ModemExternal (Snapdragon X70)—
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.3

Media

Media comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A17 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A17 Pro versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A17 ProSamsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu1,450,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,950Top 10%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)7,250Top 15%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,600Top 29%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup