Apple A18 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2400
70.5CPU51.7
53.5GPU49.4
69Benchmarks71.2
72AI—
79.6Efficiency66.5
7 spec wins — Apple A18 Pro2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A18 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 67.5 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+19) and efficiency (+13). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A18 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 71 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 67
- 58% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,400 vs 2,150
- 27% higher Max clock: 4.05 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 4.05 GHz+27% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-7500 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 60 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X75) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,750,000Top 14% | 1,914,857+9%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,400+58%Top 4% | 2,150Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,400+27%Top 8% | 6,600Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,300+13%Top 18% | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Apple A18 Provs Apple A18VSApple A18 Provs Samsung Exynos 2500VSApple A18 Provs Apple A19VSApple A18 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

