Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A18 vs Samsung Exynos 1610

Apple A18
66.2Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
68.4CPU30.7
50.6GPU—
67.5Benchmarks—
72AIspec-based—
82.1Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Apple A182 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A18

  • Stronger CPU score: 68 vs 31
  • 68% higher Max clock: 4.04 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A18 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A18Samsung Exynos 1610
Announced20242026
Process3 nm—
TDP (typical)7 W—
ArchitectureArmv9—

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A18 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A18Samsung Exynos 1610
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x4.04 GHz performance + 4x2.2 GHz efficiency2 + 6
Max clock4.04 GHz+68%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A18 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A18Samsung Exynos 1610
GPUApple GPU (5-core)Mali-G68

AI

AI comparison: Apple A18 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A18Samsung Exynos 1610
NPUNeural Engine (16-core)—
AI performance35 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A18 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A18Samsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5X-6400—
Max bandwidth60 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A18 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A18Samsung Exynos 1610
ModemSnapdragon X70 5G (external)—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.3

Media

Media comparison: Apple A18 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A18Samsung Exynos 1610
Max displaySuper Retina XDR—
Video capture4K@120fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A18 versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecApple A18Samsung Exynos 1610
AnTuTu1,650,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)3,250Top 7%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)8,050Top 12%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme3,950Top 24%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup