Apple A19 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2400
77.4CPU51.7
64.9GPU49.4
74.7Benchmarks71.2
72AI—
79.6Efficiency66.5
8 spec wins — Apple A19 Pro1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A19 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 73.5 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+26) and GPU (+16). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A19 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 77 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 65 vs 49
- Stronger benchmarks score: 75 vs 71
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 67
- 77% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,800 vs 2,150
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.26 GHz + 4x2.6 GHz | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 4.26 GHz+33% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core, Neural Accelerators) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-9600 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X80) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,200,000+15%Top 8% | 1,914,857Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,800+77%Top 2% | 2,150Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,500+44%Top 4% | 6,600Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,700+50%Top 9% | 3,800Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Apple A19 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSApple A19 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9400+VSApple A19 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSApple A19 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

