Apple A20 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2200
93.9CPU39.3
83.1GPU35.5
86.2Benchmarks57.3
100Efficiencyspec-based66.5
7 spec wins — Apple A20 Pro1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A20 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 90.2 to 46.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+55) and GPU (+48). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A20 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 94 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 83 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 86 vs 57
- 278% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,931 vs 2,100
- 215% higher AnTuTu: 3,463,072 vs 1,100,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2022 |
| Process | 2 nm+50% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | ARM | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.93 GHz + 4x2.64 GHz | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 4.93 GHz+76% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (7-core, Neural Accelerators) | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Dual 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Apple C2) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K HDR | — |
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A20 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 3,463,072+215% | 1,100,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 4,725+195%Top 1% | 1,600Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 12,575+203%Top 3% | 4,150Top 35% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 7,931+278%Top 4% | 2,100Bottom 49% |
Related comparisons
Apple A20 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9600 ProVSApple A20 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6VSApple A20 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSApple A20 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

