Skip to content
InnoReviews

Dimensity 7400 Ultra vs Unisoc T7300

Dimensity 7400 Ultra
39.2Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7300
—Inno Score
30.9CPU25.3
26.6GPU65
45.7Benchmarks—
68Efficiencyspec-based36
2 spec wins — Dimensity 7400 Ultra0 spec wins — Unisoc T7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Dimensity 7400 Ultra

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 25
  • 33% lower process: 4 nm vs 6 nm
  • 18% higher Max clock: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300

  • Stronger GPU score: 65 vs 27

General

General comparison: Dimensity 7400 Ultra versus Unisoc T7300
SpecDimensity 7400 UltraUnisoc T7300
Announced20252025
Process4 nm+33%6 nm
ArchitectureARMv8.2-AArmv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Dimensity 7400 Ultra versus Unisoc T7300
SpecDimensity 7400 UltraUnisoc T7300
Cores88
Core configuration4 + 42x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.6 GHz+18%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Dimensity 7400 Ultra versus Unisoc T7300
SpecDimensity 7400 UltraUnisoc T7300
GPUMali-G615 MC2Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—950 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Dimensity 7400 Ultra versus Unisoc T7300
SpecDimensity 7400 UltraUnisoc T7300
Memory typeLPDDR5LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Dimensity 7400 Ultra versus Unisoc T7300
SpecDimensity 7400 UltraUnisoc T7300
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth5.45.4

Media

Media comparison: Dimensity 7400 Ultra versus Unisoc T7300
SpecDimensity 7400 UltraUnisoc T7300
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Dimensity 7400 Ultra versus Unisoc T7300
SpecDimensity 7400 UltraUnisoc T7300
AnTuTu693,873—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,045Top 49%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,913Bottom 51%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,005Bottom 25%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup