Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
36.6CPU51.7
36.2GPU49.4
48.6Benchmarks71.2
58.3Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Google Tensor G28 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 42.8, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+23) and CPU (+15). Google Tensor G2 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G2
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 58
- 145% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 780,000
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz | 3.2 GHz+12% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G710 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 780,000Top 44% | 1,914,857+145%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,430Top 30% | 2,150+50%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,450Top 35% | 6,600+91%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800Top 57% | 3,800+111%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

