Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
36.6CPU72.6
36.2GPU77.4
48.6Benchmarks81.1
58.3Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G26 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 42.8, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+41) and CPU (+36). Google Tensor G2 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G2
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 49
- 302% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 1,800
- 214% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 3,450
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2026 |
| Process | 5 nm | 2 nm+60% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G710 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | — |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 780,000 | 2,827,538Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,430Top 33% | 2,995+109%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,450Top 40% | 10,824+214%Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800Bottom 43% | 7,230+302%Top 8% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

