Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
41.6CPU51.7
41GPU49.4
52.2Benchmarks71.2
69Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Google Tensor G36 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 48.4, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+19) and CPU (+10). Google Tensor G3 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G3
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 42
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 41
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 52
- 113% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 900,000
- 58% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 2,400
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 9 | 10+11% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X3 + 4x2.37 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.91 GHz | 3.2 GHz+10% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 890 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 900,000Top 36% | 1,914,857+113%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,750Top 25% | 2,150+23%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,350Top 26% | 6,600+52%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,400Top 47% | 3,800+58%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G3vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSGoogle Tensor G3vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

