Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
41.6CPU72.6
41GPU77.4
52.2Benchmarks81.1
69Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G36 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 48.4, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+36) and CPU (+31). Google Tensor G3 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G3
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 42
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 41
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 52
- 201% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 2,400
- 149% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 4,350
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 2 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 9 | 10+11% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X3 + 4x2.37 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.91 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| GPU clock | 890 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | — |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 900,000 | 2,827,538Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,750Top 27% | 2,995+71%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,350Top 31% | 10,824+149%Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,400Top 49% | 7,230+201%Top 8% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G3vs Huawei Kirin 9030 ProVSGoogle Tensor G3vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

