Skip to content
InnoReviews

Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 2600

Google Tensor G3
48.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Exynos 2600
80.4Inno Score
41.6CPU72.6
41GPU77.4
52.2Benchmarks81.1
69Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G36 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 48.4, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+36) and CPU (+31). Google Tensor G3 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G3

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600

  • Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 42
  • Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 41
  • Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 52
  • 201% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 2,400
  • 149% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 4,350

General

General comparison: Google Tensor G3 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G3Samsung Exynos 2600
Announced20232026
Process4 nm2 nm+50%
TDP (typical)8 W—
ArchitectureArmv9Armv9.3

CPU

CPU comparison: Google Tensor G3 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G3Samsung Exynos 2600
Cores910+11%
Core configuration1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X3 + 4x2.37 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A5101x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency)
Max clock2.91 GHz—

GPU

GPU comparison: Google Tensor G3 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G3Samsung Exynos 2600
GPUArm Mali-G715 MC7Samsung Xclipse 960
GPU clock890 MHz—

AI

AI comparison: Google Tensor G3 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G3Samsung Exynos 2600
NPUGoogle Edge TPUSamsung NPU

Memory

Memory comparison: Google Tensor G3 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G3Samsung Exynos 2600
Memory typeLPDDR5X—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Google Tensor G3 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G3Samsung Exynos 2600
ModemExternal (Samsung Exynos 5300)—

Media

Media comparison: Google Tensor G3 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G3Samsung Exynos 2600
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Google Tensor G3 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G3Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared900,0002,827,538Top 14%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—947,776Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,052,625Top 14%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—347,409Top 25%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—479,728Top 28%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,750Top 27%2,995+71%Top 10%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,350Top 31%10,824+149%Top 6%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,400Top 49%7,230+201%Top 8%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup