Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
45.1CPU51.7
43.1GPU49.4
56.1Benchmarks71.2
71.4Efficiency66.5
2 spec wins — Google Tensor G46 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 51.4, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+15) and CPU (+7). Google Tensor G4 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 67
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 45
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 43
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 56
- 82% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 1,050,000
- 46% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 2,600
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+3% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000Top 29% | 1,914,857+82%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950Top 21% | 2,150+10%Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,700Top 24% | 6,600+40%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600Top 42% | 3,800+46%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVS

