Skip to content
InnoReviews

Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2600

G
51.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Exynos 2600
80.4Inno Score
45.1CPU72.6
43.1GPU77.4
56.1Benchmarks81.1
71.4Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G46 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 51.4, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+34) and CPU (+27). Google Tensor G4 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600

  • Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 45
  • Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 43
  • Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 56
  • 178% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 2,600
  • 130% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 4,700

General

General comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 2600
Announced20242026
Process4 nm2 nm+50%
TDP (typical)7 W—
ArchitectureArmv9.2Armv9.3

CPU

CPU comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 2600
Cores810+25%
Core configuration1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A5201x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency)
Max clock3.1 GHz—

GPU

GPU comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 2600
GPUArm Mali-G715 MC7Samsung Xclipse 960
GPU clock940 MHz—

AI

AI comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 2600
NPUGoogle Edge TPUSamsung NPU

Memory

Memory comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 2600
Memory typeLPDDR5X—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 2600
ModemExternal (Samsung Exynos 5400)—

Media

Media comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 2600
Video capture4K@60fps—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Google Tensor G4 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecGoogle Tensor G4Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared1,050,0002,827,538Top 14%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—947,776Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,052,625Top 14%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—347,409Top 25%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—479,728Top 28%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,950Top 24%2,995+54%Top 10%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,700Top 28%10,824+130%Top 6%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,600Top 45%7,230+178%Top 8%

Related comparisons

Google Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

Try another matchup