Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
54.2CPU34.3
43.5GPU31
53.4Benchmarks48.7
82.1Efficiency66.5
8 spec wins — Google Tensor G50 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 55.7 to 41.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+20) and efficiency (+16). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 54 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 53 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 67
- 60% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,350 vs 2,100
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2022 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+35% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+14% | 1,100,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+44% | 1,600 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+49% | 4,150 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350+60% | 2,100 |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Google Tensor G3VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VS

