Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
55CPU39.3
45.7GPU35.5
60.5Benchmarks57.3
82.1Efficiency66.5
8 spec wins — Google Tensor G50 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 58.2 to 46.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+16) and efficiency (+16). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 46 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 61 vs 57
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 67
- 60% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,350 vs 2,100
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2022 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+35% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+14%Top 25% | 1,100,000Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+44%Top 12% | 1,600Top 27% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+49%Top 18% | 4,150Top 30% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350+60%Top 33% | 2,100Top 51% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VS

