Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
54.8CPU49.9
46.1GPU48.2
64.6Benchmarks70.4
82.1Efficiencyspec-based66.5
5 spec wins — Google Tensor G53 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 59.1 to 56.7, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+5). Samsung Exynos 2400e still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 50
- 25% lower process: 3 nm vs 4 nm
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
- 22% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
- 11% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,302 vs 2,066
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- Stronger benchmarks score: 70 vs 65
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2024 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+22% | 3.1 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | QHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,470,445 | 1,849,346Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 603,988Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 549,480Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 286,140Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 409,738Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,302+11%Top 12% | 2,066Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,079Top 18% | 6,341+4%Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,400Top 22% | 3,656+8%Top 20% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8450VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8450VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VS

