Google Tensor G5 vs Unisoc Tiger T820
55CPU27
45.7GPU—
60.5Benchmarks35.9
82.1Efficiency52.5
6 spec wins — Google Tensor G51 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 58.2 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+30) and CPU (+28). Unisoc Tiger T820 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 61 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 53
- 233% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 690
- 176% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,200 vs 2,250
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- 14% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+50% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 6 W+14% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+40% | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+166%Top 25% | 470,000Top 63% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+233%Top 12% | 690Top 75% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+176%Top 18% | 2,250Top 59% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350Top 33% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS