Google Tensor G6 vs Huawei Kirin 9000S
63.3CPU32
53.8GPU31.3
72.3Benchmarks46.6
84Efficiencyspec-based34.5
8 spec wins — Google Tensor G61 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G6 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+31) and benchmarks (+26). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 72 vs 47
- 177% higher AnTuTu: 1,994,033 vs 720,000
- 163% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,420 vs 1,300
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- 14% higher cores: 8 vs 7
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+57% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 7 | 8+14% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 4.1 GHz+56% | 2.62 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU clock | 1,286 MHz+71% | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google TPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,994,033+177% | 720,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,724+159%Top 13% | 1,050Top 48% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,535+128%Top 14% | 3,300Top 42% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,420+163%Top 34% | 1,300Bottom 33% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G6vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A17 ProVSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS
